Connect with us

Court News

ECOWAS Court Orders FG To Repeal/Amend Cybercrime Law

Avatar

Published

on

The Community Court of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has ordered the Federal Republic of Nigeria to either repeal or amend its law on cybercrime to align with its obligation under Article 1 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The court made the order on Friday in a judgment on a suit filed by the incorporated trustees of Laws and Rights Awareness Initiative, challenging the competence of Nigeria’s Cybercrime (Prohibition and Prevention) Act 2015.

A three-man panel of the court held that portions of the law violated Nigerians’ right to freedom of expression.
Justice Januaria T.S. Moreira Costa, in the lead judgment, held the Nigerian government liable for the violation of the right to freedom of expression by the adoption of Section 24 of its 2015 Cybercrime Act.

Other members of the panel were Justices Dupe Atoki (presiding) and Keikura Bangura.

The court rejected, for lack of evidence, other claims made by the plaintiff in relation to the contention that the law violated its members’ right to freedom of expression.

It ordered each party to bear its own cost.

Read Also: Court declines Okorocha’s request to stop probe by EFCC, Imo panel
The plaintiff had, in the suit marked: ECW/CCJ/APP/53/18 filed on 6 November 2018 by its lawyer, Chukwudi Ajaegbo, claimed among others, that its members’ freedom of expression on the internet or in the use of computer devices was limited/breached by Section 24 of the Cybercrime Act 2015.

It also claimed that nine of its collaborators were arrested and detained in connection with the enforcement of the provision of Section 24 of the Cybercrime Act in violation of Articles 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and 39 of the Nigeria’s Constitution.

The plaintiff argued that Section 24 contained vague concepts that allowed for arbitrary interpretation and application, and that the restrictions it imposes were not reasonably justifiable as they did not pursue legitimate objectives, necessary nor proportional.

The Nigerian Government, in a counter-argument, faulted the plaintiff’s claims and insisted that Section 24 of its Cybercrime Act 2015 was adopted as a legislative measure to give effect to freedom of expression as provided in Article 9(2) of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and was in accordance with provisions of Section 39(3) of the country’s 1999 Constitution.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Court News

Lawyer Who Filed Suit Against 50 EndSars Protesters In Court For Impersonation

Avatar

Published

on

A supposed legal practitioner, Mr Kenechukwu Okeke, who filed a criminal suit against 50 persons during the EndSars protest in October 2020, has been arraigned before the Magistrate court in Abuja.
Recall that Mr Kenechukwu Okeke has at October 2020 filed a suit against about 50 persons who supported the EndSars protest.
Among these persons are top celebrities and prolific personalities like Davido, Falz, Aisha Yeshufu among others.
Following this the Nigerian Bar Association has revealed that Mr Kenechukwu Okeke is not a lawyer and was never called to the Nigerian Bar.
According to the NBA, Kenechukwu Okeke’s name is not on the list of directory of lawyers in Nigeria. The NBA reported him through an official letter to the High Court, at the Federal Capital Territory Abuja.
At the hearing of the case in court on Monday, the NBA counsel told the court that the first defendant in the case, Mr Kenechukwu Okeke, has been appearing court all over Nigeria, presenting himself as a Lawyer which he is not.
The NBA produced some evidences to back up their submissions which include anauthentication from NBA website that Okeke is not a lawyer.
The NBA has therefore promised to prosecute Kenechukwu Okeke for impersonation and presenting himself to be what he is not.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Court News

Court To Hear Suit Challenging Lagos Ban Of Motorcycles, Tricycles On Dec 15

Avatar

Published

on

The Federal High Court sitting in Lagos has fixed December 15 to hear a suit seeking the reversal of the ban placed by the Lagos State Government on the operations of commercial motorcycles and tricycles, popularly known as Okada and Keke Marwa.

A Lagos-based lawyer, Julius Ajibulu, who filed the suit said the ban on okada and keke Marwa, without a replacement or an alternative means of transportation, had subjected Lagosians to untold hardship and taken away the source of livelihood of the operators.

The lawyer claimed that the ban had led to massive unemployment and an escalation in the rate of crime and insecurity in the state due to loss of jobs.

He said the ban further violated his fundamental rights and those of other Lagosians under sections 33, 34, 36, 38, 41 and 42 of the 1999 Constitution.

Ajibulu is asking the court to order “the immediate resumption of commercial operations and activities of tricyles (Keke NAPEP/ Marwa) and motorcycles (okada) of 50cc-200cc capacity engine on the above stated highways and expressways through the aforesaid bridges in 15 local government and local development council areas of Lagos State.”

He is also seeking damages in the sum of N1bn as well as a public apology in newspapers.

The suit is the second lawsuit seeking the reversal of the Lagos State Government’s ban on okada and Keke Marwa.

Another lawyer, Olukoya Ogungbeje, had earlier filed a suit before the same court on the same issue.

In his suit before Justice Mohammed Liman, Ogungbeje is seeking a declaration that “the forceful impounding, seizure or confiscation of motorcycles and tricycles” by agents of the Lagos State Government amounted to an infringement on the right of residents to own property under sections 43 and 44 of the Constitution.”

The Lagos State Government had in February proscribed both motorcycles and tricycles in six local governments and nine local council development areas of the state.

In a statement issued on January, the Commissioner for Information and Strategy, Mr Gbenga Omotosho, said that the riders must not ply 10 major highways and 40 bridges and flyovers across the state.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Court News

36 State Governments Take FG To Supreme Court Over Court Funding

Avatar

Published

on

The 36 states of the Federation on Monday took the Federal Government to the Supreme Court, challenging the presidential executive order signed in May by President Muhammadu Buhari.

The states are seeking an order of the Supreme Court to quash President Buhari’s executive order on the funding of courts, which he signed on May 20.

According to the states, Buhari’s executive order no. 00-10 of 2020 transferred the Federal Government’s responsibility of funding both the capital and recurrent expenditures of the state High Courts, Sharia Courts of Appeal, and the Customary Courts of Appeal, to the state governments.

They are contending that the order is a clear violation of sections 6 and 8(3) of the 1999 constitution, which makes it the responsibility of the federal government to fund the listed courts.

The 36 states, while claiming that they had been funding the capital projects in the listed courts since 2009, are also asking the Supreme Court to order the Federal Government to make a refund to them.

The suit was filed for the states by nine Senior Advocates of Nigeria, led by a former President of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Augustine Alegeh.

Attorney General of the Federation, Abubakar Malami was listed as the sole respondent in the suit.

Facebook Comments
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2018 -2019